Separation Anxiety: A Plan for Safer Model Rocket Deployment
CSEF · 2015 Applied Mechanics & Structures Fourth Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals Current model rocket deployment systems are limited to single motor ejection charges or separate explosive charges controlled by electronics. The purpose of this project is to design a non-pyro parachute deployment system (because minors cannot handle regulated explosives). Methods/Materials A 90cm booster was constructed from 98mm cardboard tubing. The 110cm long payload section had two hatches actuated by model aircraft retract servos. An Eggtimer altimeter I soldered triggered the servos at specified points in the rocket's flight. The final design's 40cm payload had an altimeter bay and single servo released parachute compartment. The hatches were ground tested but when flown they experienced multiple failures. The system was redesigned to use gravity to release the main parachute after a small drogue parachute was ejected at apogee using an explosive charge built into the motor. Results The initial design testing went well, so the hatch setup was flown. However, the hatches didn't stay closed during boost or deploy as planned. A new design was built and first RC ground tested, and then flight-tested to 166m with the main parachute RC released at approximately 75m. The motor eject worked to deploy the drogue parachute, and the gravity release design for the main parachute worked perfectly. Three flights using Eggtimer altimeter control were not successful due to altimeter problems, but debugging and five more vacuum tests confirmed the system was functional and deployed the main release at 45m. Two successful flights to 148m and 151m using Eggtimer altimeter control deployed the main parachute as planned at 45m. A high altitude flight to 782m with winds of 12kph landed within 100m of the launch site after successful main deploy at the planned altitude of 102m. Two final flights deployed early due to failure from coupler fatigue. Conclusions/Discussion My initial design failed due to gravity and aerodynamic issues, so I debugged and built a new design. It worked after some additional modifications to altimeter programming. I ran multiple static (vacuum) and flight tests, which showed very promising results. In the end, I was able to build a non-pyro deployment release for the main parachute that worked reliably and was easy to prep for flight. This system enables a lower cost, simple alternative to handling black powder charges for parachute deployment.
Summary statement
This project demonstrates an innovative design for model rocket dual deployment using a safe, non-pyrotechnic system.
Help received
David Raimondi for suggestions based on his experience with parachute systems, Dave Cornelius for failure analysis help on my initial design, my dad for driving to launches and ground support at launches.
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2019
Drones: Reducing Risks and Encouraging Participation in an Emerging Field, Utilizing a Parachute Deployment System
CSEF · 2016
Project ARROW: Autonomous Rocket Return on Wings
AJAS · 2022
Developing a Guidance and Control System for an F-Class Model Rocket
CSEF · 2017
An Altitude Control System for Long Duration, High Altitude Balloon Flights
CSEF · 2007
Up, Up, and Away! Model Rocket Aerodynamics and Parachute Recovery Systems
ISEF · 2021
A Novel Computer Simulation of a Deployable Parachute System with Aerial Detachment of the Cabin for Commercial Airplane Crashes, Year Two
ISEF · 2023
Optimizing Aero-Stability in Model Rockets Using Advanced Flight Algorithm and Servo-Actuated Thrust Vector Control
CSEF · 2019
Developing a UAV Free Fall Device for Microgravity Experiments
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects