Second Skin: Testing the Drag Coefficient of Swim Suit Materials
CSEF · 2002 Aerodynamics/ Hydrodynamics
Overview
Objectives/Goals Many new materials for swimsuits are being created constantly that are less resistant than human skin or faster than normal material. This led me to my problem; do the fancy new materials cause just as much drag as the old polyester suits? I plan to test the drag from each material and to see if the manufacturers are truly being honest. Methods/Materials In order to test the amounts of drag each material has in water, I made a plastic cylinder and filled it with water to drop my dummy (a pot) down. I placed different suit materials on the same pot and dropped them 175cms down a guide rod. I measured the time it took to reach the bottom and compared. The four different suit materials were the powerflow, aquapel, normal polyester, and the drag suit. As the constant I used the pot without any material. Results The aquapel was the fastest with an average time of 4.142s followed closely by the powerflow (4.155s), no suit (4.207s), the normal suit (4.675s), and the slowest was the drag suit with 5.727s. Conclusions/Discussion The use of the new material suits stretched over the pot made the system more streamline thus eliminating drag from the angles of the pot, similar to a suit smoothing out the flow surface over a human body. The fastest material was the aquapel by about one hundredth of a second to the powerflow. They were the least resistant materials and went the fastest even though they weighed less than the slower suits and had less gravitational pull. The aquapel also weighs slightly more than the powerflow. If the two materials had weighed the same there is a possibility that the powerflow would have beaten the other. As I said, the weight of the suits may have changed the outcome, but it is all relative to the materials on the human body. I also based the timing system off of humans. If I could do it differently I would use some type of electronic timing system which involved touch pad so that the human error factor would be eliminated.
Summary statement
I tested the drag of different suit materials by timing how long they took to travel a fixed distance through a column of water.
Help received
Father dropped pots during experiment.
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
What a Drag!
CSEF · 2002
Down With Drag, Part Deux: Further Investigation into the Mechanism of Decreased Hydrodynamic Drag in Swimsuit Design
CSEF · 2012
Dripping Wet: Which Swimsuit Fabric Is Fastest?
CSEF · 2007
A Comparison of Swim Times with Speedo Fastskin and Standard Lycra Swimsuits
CSEF · 2010
Swimming Can Be a Drag! Does Form and Surface Condition (the Suit) Affect the Speed of the Swimmer?
CSEF · 2009
Can Swimmers Buy Speed? How the Swimsuit Impacts the Speed of the Swim
CSEF · 2007
Does a Fastskin II Swimsuit Really Make a Swimmer Faster?
CSEF · 2003
Gold Medal Finish
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects