Scrambling Stats: The Ability of Various Card Shuffling Methods to Produce Logically Arbitrary Card Arrangements

CSEF · 2017 Mathematical Sciences

Overview

Objectives/Goals If compared against the 3 other most commonly used shuffling methods, the Block shuffle will produce the most random arrangement of cards. Methods/Materials Materials used included a computerized pseudorandom card-shuffling program and a half deck of standard playing cards. Using half of a deck expedited the shuffling process and still maintained applicability of the results. Shuffles studied included the "riffle-shuffle", the "block" shuffle, and "smooshing". To set up each shuffle, the cards were rearranged to the same position each time. Card position (measured relative to the top of the deck), trial number, and card was recorded for each trial. The "block" and "riffle" shuffling methods were tested by shuffling 3 times per trial, and the "smooshing" was performed for 30 seconds, the average time it took to perform the other methods. Results The shuffling methods did differ quite dramatically from one another, particularly the "riffle" shuffle, which was the least random. The "smooshing" shuffle however, was the most random. Conclusions/Discussion The "smooshing" method was shown to be more random than any other shuffles. The "riffle" shuffle was the most volatile among all shuffling method by the metric of average card position. Further, the "riffle" shuffle had many more consecutive card pairs and repeat card positions than the other methods. This implies that the riffle is the most predictable shuffle and that "smooshing" is the least so. Such results suggest that casinos should switch from the traditional "riffle" shuffle to something more able to produce fair results for the players.

Summary statement

Three methods of card shuffling were compared for their ability to produce random results, and the "smooshing" shuffle was shown to be the best.

Help received

None. The experiments were designed and performed solely by myself.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2017 Mathematical Sciences · Entry S1528

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google