Sandy Beaches: Pleasure or Pollutant? Year 4, An Analysis of Kelp as a Possible Source of Beach Sand Contamination
CSEF · 2011 Environmental Science
Overview
Objectives/Goals We tested as a continuation of the previous 4 years to see if decaying kelp at the high tide line could be a source of sand contamination causing many California beaches to be closed frequently. We collected fresh kelp and let it sit on sterilized and unsterilized sand for a 2-week period to see if the kelp added coliform bacteria to the sand as it decayed. Methods/Materials We built an incubator from a Styrofoam cooler and a light bulb. We collected fresh kelp from the ocean and sterilized half of it by steaming. We collected sand from the high tide line and sterilized half of it by baking it (the sterilized kelp and sand were our controls). We tested for coliform bacteria by following the state regulations using materials such as distilled water, pipettes, sterilized jars, an iron, Quanti-Trays and bacteria reagent. We then put the sealed Quanti-Trays into the incubator for 18-22 hours. Results Sterilization processes did not work. We tried sterilizing by using permanganate, but it did not work so we tried heating the kelp, but that did not work. The steaming method sterilized the kelp initially, but something contaminated all our samples and we had to throw our control data away. Our sterilization method for the sand worked initially, but later the sand became contaminated and we had to throw away our data. We do not know how the sand and kelp got contaminated. We also saw spikes of bacteria that increased and then decreased as time went on in our tests of sterilized kelp & unsterilized sand as well as sterilized sand & unsterilized kelp. Our test of unsterilized sand & unsterilized kelp had the least bacteria overall, surprisingly. Conclusions/Discussion We cannot make a reasonable conclusion with the data that we have. Our controls did not work so we have nothing to compare our data to. Also, we are confused as to why the bacteria levels in some tests increased on average and then decreased. We have a few theories as to why this is happening. Perhaps there is some sort of competition happening or maybe there are different types of coliform that we cannot distinguish between living in the sand (maybe aerobic vs. anaerobic) and we did not homogenize our mixtures enough. We modified our methods of testing when we saw they did not work (eg. Sterilization of kelp) and then we would start over. We are continuing to test and modify our project so that we can better understand what is going on.
Summary statement
We tested the decaying kelp along the high tide line in order to see if it adds coliform bacteria to the sand.
Help received
Iddex Company for donating our supplies, Darrel Steely for helping analyze our data, Adina Paytan for helping us create question and testing methods
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
Sandy Beaches: Pleasure or Pollutant? An Analysis of Sand Bacteria as a Possible Source of Ocean Contamination, Year 2
CSEF · 2007
Sandy Beaches: Pleasure or Pollutant? An Analysis of Sand Bacteria as a Possible Source of Ocean Contamination
CSEF · 2010
Sandy Beaches: Pleasure or Pollutant? Year 3
CSEF · 2007
Beach Closings: Is It the Kelp?
CSEF · 2014
Using Kelp as an Indicator of Ocean Pollution
CSEF · 2009
Is the Sand at Our Beaches Contaminated?
CSEF · 2014
Bacteria Beneath the Beach: A Study of E. coli and Coliforms in Sand from Parks and Beaches in Los Angeles County
CSEF · 2010
Testing for Antibiotic Resistant Bacteria in California Beach Sand
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects