Robot Efficiency Test
CSEF · 2003 Applied Mechanics/ Structures & Mechanisms/ Manufacturing
Overview
Objectives/Goals Our project is to test which robot can move more efficiently on both carpeted and smooth surfaces. We are testing out Robot A with legs and Robot B with wheels. We will vary the length of the legs and the size of the wheels to determine if the length and size alter the results. Methods/Materials We will be using robots, made from K'NEX, to test our hypothesis. Both robots are battery operated with similar body designs except for their mode of travel - one with legs attached to the center shaft and the other with wheels on the center shaft. After assembling the robots, place the robots on the carpeted area and measure the time it takes to travel 273 cm distance; do the same for the hardwood surface. Then we modified our experiment so that the variable was distance instead of time, to ensure the battery life would not affect the results. Results * Walking robot gave inconsistent results kept veering right and left - it also got stuck in the carpet. * Battery cord could affect the direction the robot would turn. * Both robots worked better on the hardwood floor. * The Robot A - best results were with the short legs; * The robot B best results were with the big wheels. * Robot B traveled the same distance in less time on both the carpet and smooth surface. Conclusions/Discussion The wheeled Robot with the largest wheels is more efficient than the legged robot with any length of legs, because the larger diameter wheels covered more surface area in a shorter period of time. Short-legged robot worked best of the walking robot because it is more stable and has a lower center of gravity. Overall, the wheeled robot was faster than the walking robot because it has fewer moving parts.
Summary statement
Robotic movement comparison using various sized legs and wheels on different surfaces.
Help received
Mother helped type report, prepare charts.
Competition history
- CSEF 2003
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2014
Treads or Wheels? The More Efficient Option
CSEF · 2002
Comparing 4 and 6 Legged Motion
CSEF · 2014
Car Performance
CSEF · 2014
Human vs. Robot
CSEF · 2015
Human vs. Robot: The Final Showdown
CSEF · 2010
Pulling Weight on... Mars?
CSEF · 2009
Robotic Hexapod
CSEF · 2003
Robotics
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects