Ready... Aim... Fire!
CSEF · 2003 Aerodynamics/ Hydrodynamics
Overview
Objectives/Goals My objective was to determine which mortar design would launch a tennis ball the farthest; a mortar with one baffle or a mortar with two baffles. Methods/Materials Naphtha, tennis balls, pringles containers, fireplace matches, duct tape, 4inch thin-walled PVC pipe, drill, tape measure, teaspoon and hair dryer. I built two tennis ball mortars from three Pringles potato chip containers. One of them had a single baffle made in the bottom of the top can. The other one had a baffle in the middle can also. I heated each mortar with a hair dryer for two minutes before each firing. I poured one teaspoon naphtha down the barrel being careful to get passed the baffles into the base. I put the tennis ball in the barrel and it rested on the baffle. I held the ball in place and shook the mortar to vaporize the naphtha. I put the mortar into the firing tube and leaned it against a chair with a slight angle and lit the fuel air mixture through the firing hole in the base. Then I measured the distance that the ball traveled. I did the final trial six times with each mortar. Results My results were very different for each mortar. The mortar with two baffles fired the tennis ball as far as 101' while the mortar with one baffle only went 13'8" at the same angle. In all six of the final trials the mortar with two baffles fired the ball farthest and made the biggest bang. Conclusions/Discussion I thought that the mortar with one baffle would shoot the farthest because there would be more room for the naphtha to expand and mix with oxygen and make a lot of the fuel mixture. I learned that having the fuel mixture in a more confined area made it burn more efficiently and quickly which caused a bigger explosion. The baffle on top held the ball in place and the baffle on the bottom kept the fuel contained.
Summary statement
My project is to find out which tennis ball mortar is more efficient at firing a ball; one with one baffle or one with two baffles.
Help received
The chemistry teacher and the physical science teacher helped me work out the problems I had making the mortars work. My mom helped me build the mortars, typed the application and gave me encouragement.
Competition history
- CSEF 2003
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
Launching into Physics: A Study of Projectile Motion
CSEF · 2012
Propelled Potatoes
CSEF · 2002
As Good As It Gets
CSEF · 2011
Flying Flowers Flaming Hairspray
CSEF · 2006
Backyard Ballistics
CSEF · 2014
Engineering Rocket Science: Can I Make a Small Scale Oxyhydrogen Powered Rocket Launcher?
CSEF · 2010
It Will Blow You Away
CSEF · 2007
Spudgun Ballistics
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects