Radio Microwaves and Cell Phone Use
CSEF · 2015 Product Science (Physical) (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals My goal was to determine if different generations of smart phones are affected by different functions. Methods/Materials Materials: iPhone 3, iPhone 4, iPhone 4s, iPhone 5, iPhone 6, iPad 2, iPad 3, iPad Mini, TriField Meter Model 100XE EMF detector, DIY template so that the EMF detection meter is 2.5, 7.6, 15.2 cm away from the device antenna. Take EMF reading on Airplane Mode, on a non-metallic surface to detect any radio frequency field. Place the cellular phone in a standardized position 2.5, 7.6, or 15.2 cm away from the EMF detector on Airplane Mode to determine any activity in the absence of cellular transmission. Calling: Place a call from the cellular device to a nearby landline. Count the number of spikes that the meter detects over a period of five minutes and record results. FaceTime# : Place a call from the cellular device to a nearby landline. Count the number of spikes that the meter detects over a period of 5 minutes of the FaceTime# and record results. Loading a browser on the web: Place a call from the cellular device to a nearby landline.Count the number of spikes while it loads the page. Record results and analyze data. The plan was to do 15 trials per device per activity; this was overwhelming. So, I kept the trials that had been completed and reduced the number of trials from 15 to 3 for the distances 2.5 cm and 7.6 cm. Results I wanted to test which functions of the smartphones emitted the most EMFs. I tested different generations of iPhones and measured the emissions at different distances and emissions for different tasks. There was a trend of low activity while web surfing in all phones. For calling, the amount of EMF microwaves was low compared to FaceTime#. There were times using both FaceTime# and calls when the phone emitted frequent and intense microwave activity. The iPhone 6 (1) emitted a long and intense period of spiking during our trials, lasting 20 min. I did the most trials at 15.2 cm and a long period of intense and sustained spiking of microwaves was detected. During the 2.5 cm trials I saw only one brief intense period. In the 7.6 cm trials, there were no intense periods of spiking. The isolated and infrequent long spiking may be explained by the cell phone transmitting to the cell tower. Conclusions/Discussion This data supported my hypothesis when it came to Calling, Airplane Mode, and Web surfing. It did not
Summary statement
Electromagnetic fields from different generations of cell phones with different activities at different distances were the highest for FaceTime# and lowest for Airplane Mode.
Help received
Mom helped set-up board; Dad helped edit and supervise and purchased meter;My science teachers helped edit and improve my writing; Mrs. Takata helped with this application
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
Microwave Emissions of Cellular Phones
CSEF · 2014
iPhone Microwave Emissions on 3G/4G: Is Faster Better?
CSEF · 2012
Cell Phones: Friend or Foe?
CSEF · 2014
The Effect of Distance and Mode on Cell Phone Radiation Emission
CSEF · 2017
Cell Phone Radiation: Watts Worse, Voice or Data Transmissions? A Comparison of Electromagnetic Field Strength
CSEF · 2014
Watts All This Talk about Radiation?
CSEF · 2014
Radiation: How Safe Are You with Your Daily Devices?
CSEF · 2006
Cell Phone Radiation
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects