Optimal Levitation Height Based on the Placement of a Neodymium Magnet on a YBCO Superconductor

CSEF · 2012 Electronics & Electromagnetics

Overview

Objectives/Goals The purpose of this research project was to determine if placing a neodymium magnet (Nd2Fe14B) on a certain location, or quadrant of a Yttrium barium copper oxide superconductor would result in the very differential yielded heights of levitation while levitating using the Meissner Effect of Superconductivity. Methods/Materials To obtain the magnet and superconductor, a Colorado Superconductor Inc. Kit was used. Four quadrants were drawn onto the superconductor and the center of it was marked also. An apparatus consisting of an area for the superconductor and liquid nitrogen to be placed for the initial levitation was designed and created from a simple Styrofoam box and a bowl, the bowl had a hole in the side that allowed a green laser that was attached to the box pass its beam through and take advantage of the liquid nitrogen vapor, resulting in a illuminating green beam. This allowed one to simply take pictures of each conducted trial and then use ImageJ # an image analysis program from the National Institutes of Health, to calibrate the pixel to millimeter ratio and find accurate and precise data. Images were taken from an angle, and from the top (to validate the levitation). Using ImageJ the levitation Height of each magnet can be found by subtracting the distance from superconductor to the bottom of the laser beam by the mean of the distance of the magnet from the beam. The following equation was formed: Levitation height = D # B(m). Results Every trial conducted made it blatantly obvious to the naked eye that quadrant three of the superconductor demonstrated the lowest levitation heights 100% of the time. There was no trial were any quadrant levitated lower than quadrant three. There was an average deviation of 1.5, and the percent deviation was 14.2%, due to the fact that quadrant three and the center had such a large difference. In reality the deviation would be much lower; however each trial received a deviation, not each quadrant because it would be very difficult to calculate with a square shape magnet. Conclusions/Discussion The center levitated the highest 100% of the time, this ongoing trend suggests that the closer the magnet is placed towards the center, the greater the levitation height. This is perhaps due to the fact that the center has the greatest amount of excluded fields, and thus the greatest levitation heights.

Summary statement

Finding the best placement on a superconductor for the highest levitation height.

Help received

Professor Debra Mauzy-Melitz provided a lab at UCI to work in

Competition history

  • CSEF 2012 Electronics & Electromagnetics · Entry S0915

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google