Motor Learning in a Robot: Testing Competing Ideas from Neuroscience
CSEF · 2007 Mathematics & Software
Overview
Objectives/Goals Movements need to be accurate for humans and animals alike. Therefore, the method used by the nervous system to generate these movements is important. There are many aspects of motor control, such as direction, speed, and distance of movement. This experiment examines how to control the distance of a movement. Neuroscientists have proposed two possible methods for accurately controlling the motor commands used to generate the distance of a movement: timing and corollary discharge. The timing method uses timers in the brain to measure the amount of time from the start of a movement to determine when to stop. Alternately, the corollary discharge method uses a copy of its own motor command to estimate the distance traveled in a movement in order to decide when to stop. Methods/Materials In order to perform a realistic test of these two methods, I needed to 1) implement each method in a separate program to control a robot, and 2) test the programs in a challenging task. Each program was written in RCX code, and downloaded into the LMRIS 2.0 robot, called Roverbot. The challenging task was to make it learn from a single experience to stop before it hit an object. During the learning experience, the Roverbot traveled forward on a track until hitting a wall. During future trials, it traveled a distance that was based on the motor control method. Results After testing the two methods in a robot, I found that corollary discharge is a more consistent method than timing when there are random variations in the motor#s commanded speed. Conclusions/Discussion Although neuroscientists propose that both methods are used by the brain to control the distance of movements, this data supports the corollary discharge method by showing that movements would be more accurate if the brain used corollary discharge rather than timing. The data also suggests that corollary discharge would be helpful in building robotic devices and possibly prosthetic limbs.
Summary statement
This project uses a robotic device to test the hypothesis that corollary discharge is more consistent than timing in controlling the distance of a movement where motor commands vary.
Help received
Dad helped do background research and advised during program development; Mom helped put together board; Mr. Gardinier gave feedback on project ideas.
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
Utilizing Artificial Neural Networks to Create a Learning Robot
CSEF · 2011
Mission Control: Programming for Optimal Error Reduction in Line-Following Applications
CSEF · 2018
The Effect of Unilateral Visuomotor Adaptation Training on the Untrained Limb
ISEF · 2024
Applying a Simplified Motion Profiling Algorithm to a Target Following Arm With Two Degrees of Freedom: A Three Year Study
CSEF · 2006
A Simulation of Optic Flow in a Predator Prey Relationship
CSEF · 2008
Robots: Are They Better than Us?
CSEF · 2012
Learning to Walk: Building and Programming a Virtual Robot
CSEF · 2017
Decoding the Artificial Intelligence behind Tactile and Photocell Navigation
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects