Modified Electrode Placement for 12-Lead Electrocardiogram
CSEF · 2007 Electronics & Electromagnetics Honorable_mention Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals Is 12-lead modified-torso electrode ECG interchangeable with standard 12-lead ECG? Based on my research, I hypothesized that modified-torso method will result in diagnostic interpretations different from standard because electrical signals obtained from the body will vary depending on electrode placement on the body. Methods/Materials The study compares diagnostic outcome of two sequential 12-lead ECGs in 24 adult patients, one being taken with approved standard and the other with modified-torso methods. Results Modified-torso method produced important amplitude and waveform changes associated with shift of the P, T and QRS frontal plane axes, particularly in those with abnormal standard ECGs. Such changes generated important diagnostic interpretation differences in 46% of patients with abnormal standard ECGs, making abnormalities disappear in 4 patients resulting in normal ECGs, and in 2 patients changing diagnostic outcome of abnormalities. Torso method also caused clinically important frontal axes changes in one patient with normal standard ECG. Conclusions/Discussion Modified-torso method resulted in diagnostic interpretations different from standard because electrical signals obtained from the body varied depending on electrode placement on the body. It is vital that ECGs should be acquired in the standard way unless there are particular reasons for not doing so like reducing limb movement artifacts, increasing speed of application in emergency by minimizing undressing and any modification of electrode placement must be reported on the ECG itself. Data fully supported the hypothesis. Findings agree with the information found in the literature.
Summary statement
By comparing 12-lead modified electrode ECGs with standard in 24 patients, it was shown that first method produced important waveform changes causing diagnostic interpretation differences, therefore these methods are not interchangeable.
Help received
Consulting, transportation to obtain necessary materials and literature. Glendale Adventist Medical Center provided equipment and lab.
Awards (1)
- Honorable Mention
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2012
Utility of the Spatial Peaks QRS-T Angle in Distinguishing Left Ventricular Hypertrophy from Athletic Heart Syndrome
CSEF · 2017
CordisX: Personalized Cardiac Monitor
CSEF · 2013
iPhone Acquired Heart Rhythm: Is It Reliable for Clinical Diagnosis?
ISEF · 2015
Reducing the Risk of Misdiagnosis Using New Visualized Method for ECG
CSEF · 2005
Cardiac Measurement and Analysis
ISEF · 2016
Stochastic Analysis in Biomedical Engineering: Identifying Acute Myocardial Infarction
CSEF · 2013
EMIT: Does iPad Use in Patients with Implantable Cardiac Rhythm Devices Cause Electromagnetic Interference?
CSEF · 2014
An Echocardiographic Assessment of an Athlete's and Non-Athlete's Heart
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects