Metals Removal by Nature's Biofilter
CSEF · 2002 Environmental Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective was to determine if the wetland on the Penn Mine site reduces the amount of dissolved metals in the water from the creeks and seepages that flows into Camanche Reservoir from the Penn Mine site. Methods/Materials Water quality data was used from the Penn Mine water quality monitoring program that is performed by EBMUD. In addition, a new sample location was added just below the wetland. This new sample location was used to determine if there was a reduction of metals in the wetland. The wetland was measured for total area and for the most common plants in the wetland. Conditions and changes in the wetland were monitored during the study including: weather, rainfall, and water flow. Water samples were analyzed for the following parameters: dissolved metals, pH, temperature and turbidity. Results The wetland was more effective at reducing dissolved metals during periods of low flows and high detention times. Copper was reduced by 73% in September 2001. The flow was 0.5 gpm and the detention time was 20 days. The January and February 2002 sample data were much different than previous sample data. A seepage (PRSS-3) with very high levels of metals began flowing in January 2002. The only metal that was reduced in the wetland was iron. All other metals increased (except nickel in January) through the wetland. The previous months saw an increase in pH at wetland outlet. However, pH decreased from 5.5 to 4.7 in January; and 5.8 to 4.6 in February. Conclusions/Discussion The wetland was most effective at dissolved metals removal during the months of September, October, and November 2001. The flows through the wetland were low (2 gpm or lower) during sample collection. Flow did not exceed 63 gpm through the wetland during this time. The average flow through the wetland was 8 gpm or less for these three months. The wetland continued to remove dissolved metals in December 2001 except for manganese and nickel with a flow of 32 gpm. The overall removal was not as good as the previous three months. Rain in December increased flows through the wetland, however the high flows occurred later in the month and in January 2002. Loading on the wetland increased with high flows from the rain and most significantly from seepage PRSS-3. The high flows which peaked at 1,706 gpm on January 2, 2002 also dumped sediment in the wetland.
Summary statement
This project examined dissolved metals reduction in the water flow through the Penn Mine wetland for a period of six months.
Help received
Mom and Dad drove me to the site. EBMUD provided lab data including my new sample site. Friends helped with plant identification and construction of sample display. Mom and Dad also helped with typing and graphs.
Awards (1)
- Category Award
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2003
Solving the Mystery of the Penn Mine Wetland
CSEF · 2004
What's in That Water? A Study of Water Filtration in a Wetland Ecosystem
CSEF · 2010
The Effects of Various Filtration Media on Stormwater Contaminants
CSEF · 2009
Bioremediation Impacts on Water Quality: Effects on Urban Runoff
CSEF · 2009
Do Wetlands Effectively Remove Nitrates from San Diego Creek Water Before Discharging into the Ocean?
CSEF · 2017
Removing Heavy Metals with an Affordable Home Filter: A Second Year Study
CSEF · 2008
Save the Wetlands: Investigating Pond Water Quality and Water Sources
CSEF · 2006
Heavy Metal Trafficking: Rhizofiltration Efficacy of Elodea canadensis in Copper Contaminated Effluents
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects