Memory

CSEF · 2006 Behavioral Sciences

Overview

Objectives/Goals Learning is the main objective in the classroom, but with the current methods of teaching this can at times be a more difficult task than it need be. The purpose of this experiment was to determine which method of presenting information-the pictorial, textual or verbal method-was most effective at helping student#s ages 12-14 retain the information they had studied. Methods/Materials To reach a solution I had a selected group of students study a set of information with the intent of memorizing it. I was able to measure their level of retention by having them complete a 5 question test based on the information they had just perceived. Results The measurements derived from these tests confirmed my hypothesis that the pictorial method was more effective than the textual or verbal methods of presenting information to students. Of the tests conducted the best value for the pictorial method was 4.6 (out of 5) correct answers per test, while the best value for the textual method was 4.1 correct answers per test which was followed by the verbal method whose best value consisted of 3.1 correct answers per test. Conclusions/Discussion These results suggest that the current means of teaching, which mainly relies on textbooks to convey the information, is ample but could be further improved. Based on my findings it is my belief that this could be accomplished by further supplementing our existing textbooks with more graphs and illustrations.

Summary statement

The intent of this project was to shed light on which method of conveying information was the most effective at helping 12-14 year old children retain the information.

Help received

Participants used under supervision of science teacher.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2006 Behavioral Sciences · Entry J0323

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google