Launch It!
CSEF · 2010 Applied Mechanics & Structures
Overview
Objectives/Goals I was wondering what the effect of variance in settings on the range of a trebuchet was. I believed that a ratio of 1-4 on the arm would produce the best ranges. I also thought that the greater the counterweight, the more the range. The ratio is between the end of the arm with the counterweight and the end of the arm with the sling. Methods/Materials The materials I used were the trebuchet, a logbook, pennies, marbles, a book, a tape measure, a pen, and rubber bands. The procedure I used was to first prepare the trebuchet, launch the projectile, measure the distance, record the distance, then repeat 4 more times. Then I would change settings and repeat. Results The ratio of 1-4 was higher than 1-7 or 4-11. The trajectory of 4-11 was a relatively straight line slanting downwards, but the trajectory of the 1-7 was an upward bell curve. Conclusions/Discussion The 1-7 produced the most consistent data, but the 4-11 was random. My hypothesis was mostly proven, because the ratio of 1-4 was the highest range, and also because the counterweight had a positive correlation with the range.
Summary statement
My project is an investigation on how a variance of settings can affect the range of a trebuchet.
Help received
Dad helped count pennies, helped build trebuchet; Teacher(Mark Hobbs) helped on binder.
Competition history
- CSEF 2010
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2008
Ready, Aim, Fire! Maximizing the Trebuchet's Range
CSEF · 2009
Beware Ye Minifigures
CSEF · 2004
Trebuchet
CSEF · 2017
Trebuchet: The Counterweight to Payload Ratio
CSEF · 2009
The Perfect Trebuchet: Effects of Arm Length and Counterweight on the Projectile Distance
CSEF · 2006
The Art and Science of a Trebuchet
CSEF · 2005
The Workings of an Ancient Trebuchet
CSEF · 2005
The Trebuchet: A Study of Mechanics and Motion
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects