Is Money the Answer to Improving Education?
CSEF · 2003 Mathematics & Software
Overview
Objectives/Goals To determine if there is a correlation between money spent on middle school students and their performance in high school, using a microcosm of Tamalpais High and it's three "feeder" middle schools: Mill Valley Middle School, Bolinas/Stinson Middle School, and Martin Luther King Middle School. Methods/Materials To make this determination, I first collected and organized all of the students into each grade level (freshmen-senior); and the students of each grade level into the middle school they attended. I averaged the GPA for each category. I used the Chi Square Test (statistical analysis) to determine if there was a relationship between the middle school a student attended and their success (with regard to GPA) in high school. Once I determined that there was a relationship, I compared the average amount of money spent on a child without special needs at a particular school to how thr student from that school performed in high school in terms of GPA. Results Through the Chi-Square Test, the probability that there was NOT a relationship between money spent on students in middle school and their GPA in high school was under 1.5%, therefore it could be determined that there was a relationship between the two categorical variables. I discovered that MVMS spent $4,200 per student each year without special need, and Bolinas spent $6,915 while MLK spent $9,000. Freshmen through senior year, the average GPA of a student who attended MLK is a 2.25, the average of student who attended Bolinas was 3.01, while students who attended MVMS average GPA was a 3.25. Conclusions/Discussion The results were the inverse of what would be expected. These results taken to the extreme would mean that the best school would be a school without money. This is obviously false. While money is imperative to education in the US for things as basic as classrooms, desk, books and teacher; these results indicate that there may be a factor greater than money in determining a student's success. This factor may be the education of the guardians of the child; at what age the parents began reading to their child, or possibly the family's income. Further research would need to be done to determine what this factor is, but according to my results there is a factor greater than money.
Summary statement
Analysis of stastical data regarding the relationship between money spent on students in middle and their sucess in high school.
Help received
none.
Competition history
- CSEF 2003
Resources
Related projects
JSHS · 2023
The Difference in Correlation Between Attendance and Grade Point Average Throughout Secondary Education
CSEF · 2002
Does the Strength of the Parent-Child Relationship affect Grades?
CSEF · 2011
My School Is Awesome (Academically). Or Is It?
CSEF · 2004
Is There a Strong Correlation between a Student's Motivation and Achievement at Their Ability Level?
CSEF · 2015
Finding a Correlation between Public School Lunch Meal Cost and Public School Physical Fitness Test in the State of CA
CSEF · 2014
Post High School Exposure and Its Effect on Post High School Decisions
CSEF · 2003
Irrelevant Quotient
CSEF · 2002
The Effect of Kindergarten Entrance Age among High School Students
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects