Is Half Better Than Whole?
Overview
Objectives/Goals The project was to determine if the BHmax of a magnet would affect the regeneration of planarian. It was thought the magnet would not have any effect. Methods/Materials Fifteen Planarian, twenty-five Petri dishes, and pond water were all put together. Then ten of the planarian were bisected and put into the Petri dishes under the specific label (No Magnet, No Magnet (bisected), BHmax 52, BHmax 42, and BHmax 38). The planarians were then measured every day for thirteen days. Results The planarian with no magnet grew more in the thirteen day period and the planarian with BHmax 42 grew the least in the thirteen day period. Conclusions/Discussion The conclusion is that magnets had little effect on the planarian. The planarians that were bisected actually took longer to grow then the one that was not but the magnets still did not affect the regeneration. This expands the human knowledge to knowing how to regenerate and if people are capable.
Summary statement
Exposing planarian to different BHmax and observing their growth rate.
Help received
Mother bought materials;Mrs. Hoffman had guidelines; Ms. Flynn helped through the process.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2010
When Half a Worm Is Not Enough: Effects of Magnetism on Planaria Regeneration and Growth
CSEF · 2011
The Effects of Magnetism on the Semi-Immortal Planaria
CSEF · 2014
The Effect of Magnetism on Planaria Regeneration
CSEF · 2007
Animal Magnetism: How Does Magnetism Affect the Rate of Regeneration in Planaria?
CSEF · 2019
Project Planaria
CSEF · 2017
Is Planarian Regeneration Affected by Magnetic Fields?
CSEF · 2004
How Does the Intensity of a Magnetic Field Affect the Regeneration Rate of a Planarian?
CSEF · 2008
Planaria Regeneration
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects