"Indian Restaurant" or "Interstate": An Analysis of Voice Frequency across Ethnic Identities
CSEF · 2009 Physics & Astronomy
Overview
Objectives/Goals Why do voice recognition systems (VRS's) often misinterpret words of foreign-born English speakers-even without an accent? Is there a physical distinction between the sounds native- & foreign-born English speakers speak, maybe a distinctive #frequency signature#? Hypothesis:People of different ethnicities speaking the same English words produce physically different output waves with distinct frequency signatures dependent on their geographical location. Methods/Materials 1.Get sound clips of foreign language speakers(FLS) speaking an English paragraph-mine were from George Mason Universitys linguistics database. 2.Organize these sound files into a database categorized by the location (continents) of the FLS & by the time the speaker has lived in an English-speaking country (less than 1/2 of life, more than 1/2 of life). Choose a specific phoneme to focus the study on (as VRS's break down words similarly). 3. Use FFT algorithm, examining frequency, to analyze data. Using SpectraPLUS software, run the sound samples through the spectrogram plot and cut the spectrogram output down until it includes only the phoneme focused on.Repeat step 3 for all sound files. 4.Organize the outputs into a display (placing them side-by-side) in order to: a.Phase1: Compare speakers with others from their own region, b.Phase2: Compare Phase1 speakers with long-term emigrants to English-speaking countries., c.Phase3: Compare long-term emigrants from Phase2 to native English speakers. Results -There is indeed a distinct physical difference in the English words of speakers from around the world, with similarities seen in clusters dependent on geographical location. -With more exposure to native-born English speakers in English-speaking countries, the frequency signature of most foreign-language speakers shifted to the frequency signature of English spoken by native speakers(ESNS). Lower frequencies shifted as much as 60 Hz down to the standard ESNS threshold;higher frequencies shifted up as much as 800 Hz up to the standard ESNS threshold. Conclusions/Discussion The implications of my study are that current VRS's are ineffective because of the range of frequencies they analyze may not be the same as users'.I surmised that a possible solution to the issue of a VRS programmed only to detect certain frequency intervals could be to create a dial that could be turned to tell the VRS by how much to bias the frequencies.
Summary statement
My study maps the geographical locations of English speakers (both first & and second language) to the physical characteristics of the sounds they speak, specifically frequency.
Help received
Father helped me with statistical analysis; Mother helped with presentation board.
Competition history
- CSEF 2009
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2013
Person Identification by Voice Spectral Analysis
CSEF · 2023
Development of a Novel Automatic Speech Recognition to Reduce Racial and Gender Bias
ISEF · 2025
Telling the Difference: Understanding the Difficulties of Perceiving New Languages
CSEF · 2015
Northern California Vowel Shift: English Phonological Change in Progress
CSEF · 2006
Voices That Speak to Us
CSEF · 2012
Say It Again? A Study of the Effect of Bilingual Accents
CSEF · 2014
Did You Catch That?
CSEF · 2008
Human Speech Component Analysis
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects