How Particulate Matter Concentrations Vary by Location and by Combustion
CSEF · 2015 Environmental Science
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objectives of my project were to determine if particulate matter (PM) concentrations were affected by indoors and outdoors locations and by different cooking methods. Methods/Materials PM2.5, ultrafine particles (UFP), black carbon (BC), and PAHs (polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons) were measured using real-time monitors, which used inertial collection and particle counters. PM was measured in a backyard, in a lab and in a house, and near combustion: burning candles, boiling water, deep frying food, BBQs, and use of Panini grills, ovens, and electric grills. The times of distinctive changes of surrounding conditions during combustion were recorded. Results In January, the concentration of PM2.5 in a backyard was higher than PM2.5 concentration indoors and in Fresno Central Monitoring Station outdoors. In November, the concentration of PM2.5 outdoors was still higher than the PM2.5 concentration indoors but not higher than the PM2.5 measured in Fresno Central Monitoring Station. In January and November, PM concentrations measured outdoors increased at noon and in the evening. PM2.5, BC, and PAHs increased the most in charcoal BBQ. Concentrations of all components of PM increased more for Panini grill than electric grill. Boiling water and use of ovens affected the components of PM the least. PM2.5 increased the most in charcoal BBQ, Panini grill, and electric grill. UFP increased the most in Panini grill, electric grill, and charcoal BBQ. BC increased the most in charcoal BBQ, Panini grill, and electric grill. PAHs increased the most in charcoal BBQ, deep frying food, and burning candles. Conclusions/Discussion PM concentrations are higher outdoors than indoors. During the higher PM days, the PM measurements varied more depending on location outdoors. Times of more traffic caused higher PM concentrations from motor vehicles. The highest concentrations of PM2.5, BC, and PAHs were observed during outdoor BBQ because of incomplete combustion of charcoal. PM2.5, UFP, and BC concentrations increased more for grilling than deep frying, burning candles, boiling water, and using ovens because grilling can char or burn food. Unlike BC, UFP, and PM2.5, PAHs increased more in deep frying and burning candles than in grilling because of incomplete combustion of carbon-containing fuels, such as oil, fat, and wax.
Summary statement
My project tests how the concentrations of different components of particulate matter, such as PM2.5, UFP, BC, and PAHs, are affected when we stay indoors, outdoors, or near combustion, such as cooking, using real-time aerosol monitors.
Help received
My father is an expert in environmental science and operated the real-time aerosol monitors, which were from California State University, Fresno, and also helped construct the graphs.
Competition history
- CSEF 2015
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2018
The Effects of Different Micro-Environments and Activities on Personal Exposure to Black Carbon
CSEF · 2002
Ash Particulates as Air Pollutants
CSEF · 2015
Solution to Cooking Pollution
CSEF · 2010
Examining Air Quality
CSEF · 2013
Evaluating Black Carbon Concentrations in Urban Aerosols
CSEF · 2004
Don't Hold Your Breath: Air Quality and Carbon Pollutants
CSEF · 2015
Best Time to Breathe? Changes in Air Quality Due to Different Factors in an Urban Area
CSEF · 2018
Particulate Matter Spatial Analysis in Micro-Environments: Decreasing Childhood Microfine PM Exposure
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects