Hear It, Say It, Spell It: Investigating Nonvisual Pathways in Spelling

CSEF · 2008 Behavioral & Social Sciences

Overview

Objectives/Goals About 20% of the English speaking population has a spelling disability. This study was conducted to determine if auditory and verbal pathways in the brain could be used to learn how to spell, instead of the visual pathway usually emphasized in school. Methods/Materials Adults were given a classifying test of 29 frequently misspelled words, followed by a pretest of 20 pseudowords (pretest 1). Subjects then studied these words by listening to the spellings repeated 3 times /day for 4 days. A post-test was given on the 5th day. The process was repeated with a second set of words (pretest 2), but the subjects were asked to listen to and repeat the spelling aloud. All tests and instructions were carried out via email using sound files. The subjects were never allowed to see the spelling of the pseudowords. Results Box plots with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate learning. The median score for pretest 1 was 5% (CI=0, 8.75) vs. 80% for post-test 1 (CI=8.75, 95), indicating a 75% improvement using the auditory study method. The median score for pretest 2 was 10% (CI= 0, 15) vs. 70% for posttest 2 (95% CI = 65, 93.75), indicating 60% improvement using the auditory and verbal study method. Two-tailed paired t tests showed that the difference between the medians for each set of pretests and post-tests was statistically significant (p <0.0001). Conclusions/Discussion Both methods were successful, but those who scored poorly on the classifying test seemed to benefit most by combining two pathways. It is possible that those who are chronically bad spellers have an under developed section of the brain that processes spelling visually, or that visual connections to the "spelling center" were not developed. It may be possible to improve spelling ability by bypassing the visual connection and making connections to the "spelling center" using alternative sensory pathways or multiple sensory pathways. Better understanding of this could lead to the development of alternative methods for teaching spelling that bypass the visual pathway.

Summary statement

Can spelling ability be improved by using nonvisual sensory pathways?

Help received

Mother taught me the necessary statistics and helped find subjects.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2008 Behavioral & Social Sciences · Entry S0313

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google