Hear It, Say It, Spell It: Investigating Nonvisual Pathways in Spelling
CSEF · 2008 Behavioral & Social Sciences
Overview
Objectives/Goals About 20% of the English speaking population has a spelling disability. This study was conducted to determine if auditory and verbal pathways in the brain could be used to learn how to spell, instead of the visual pathway usually emphasized in school. Methods/Materials Adults were given a classifying test of 29 frequently misspelled words, followed by a pretest of 20 pseudowords (pretest 1). Subjects then studied these words by listening to the spellings repeated 3 times /day for 4 days. A post-test was given on the 5th day. The process was repeated with a second set of words (pretest 2), but the subjects were asked to listen to and repeat the spelling aloud. All tests and instructions were carried out via email using sound files. The subjects were never allowed to see the spelling of the pseudowords. Results Box plots with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to evaluate learning. The median score for pretest 1 was 5% (CI=0, 8.75) vs. 80% for post-test 1 (CI=8.75, 95), indicating a 75% improvement using the auditory study method. The median score for pretest 2 was 10% (CI= 0, 15) vs. 70% for posttest 2 (95% CI = 65, 93.75), indicating 60% improvement using the auditory and verbal study method. Two-tailed paired t tests showed that the difference between the medians for each set of pretests and post-tests was statistically significant (p <0.0001). Conclusions/Discussion Both methods were successful, but those who scored poorly on the classifying test seemed to benefit most by combining two pathways. It is possible that those who are chronically bad spellers have an under developed section of the brain that processes spelling visually, or that visual connections to the "spelling center" were not developed. It may be possible to improve spelling ability by bypassing the visual connection and making connections to the "spelling center" using alternative sensory pathways or multiple sensory pathways. Better understanding of this could lead to the development of alternative methods for teaching spelling that bypass the visual pathway.
Summary statement
Can spelling ability be improved by using nonvisual sensory pathways?
Help received
Mother taught me the necessary statistics and helped find subjects.
Competition history
- CSEF 2008
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2007
The Reading Mind: Word Recognition in Short-Term Memory
CSEF · 2004
Spell M-O-D-A-L-I-T-Y: Does Learning Style Affect a Child's Ability to Spell Accurately?
CSEF · 2007
Can the Brain Translate Misspelled Words?
CSEF · 2007
Studying the Effects of Contextual Information on the Analysis of Words
CSEF · 2004
The Effect of Altered Spelling and Grammatical Structure on the Reading Speed of Adult Males
CSEF · 2019
Effects of Auditory Cues on Recall of Visual Materials
CSEF · 2016
Is Seeing Perceiving? Do Visual Cues Enhance Auditory Attention and Comprehension in a Mixed Speech Background?
CSEF · 2014
How the Eye Views and Reads Words
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects