Genomic Comparison Between Pathogenic A. actinomycetemcomitans and Non-Pathogenic H. aphrophilus
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective of my project was to find the fragments of DNA that were present in A.actinomycetemcomitans (A.a.) and not present in H.aphrophilus (H.a.). A.a. is the bacteria associated with juvenile periodontitis and H.a. is its harmless, phylogenetic cousin. Methods/Materials The method of Representational Difference Analysis (RDA) was employed to reveal the differences between A. actinomycetemcomitans and H. aphrophilus. It is essentially a subtraction method that allows only the DNA fragments unique to A.a. to be replicated by Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Results Eight fragments of DNA from A. actinomycetemcomitans were found, cloned into competent cells, and sequenced. Those sequences were later compared to other genomes decoded online on such websites as NCBI and Oklahoma University. Homologues to four of these fragments were found and compared, the four others found no homology to either sites' databases. Therefore, these fragments are deemed to be unique to A.a. (concluded from the information on the database) and some of them are even unique to the particular strain used, D-7. Conclusions/Discussion These fragments were matched to other pathogenic bacteria (such as: Multocida tuberculosis, and Escherichia coli, for example), leading to the possibility that several of these pathogenic bacteria share similar genes that allow them to be pathogenic. The fragments coded for such things as sensory kinases, methionine aminopeptidases, etc. These functions could be the reason why A.a. causes juvenile periodontitis and H.a. is completely commensal. For example, the sensory kinase could help A.a. sense other bacteria in the mouth, competeing for a similar ecological niche.
Summary statement
The project focuses on finding the genomic differences between A. actinomyctemcomitans and H. aphrophilus in hopes of finding the genes responsible for making A. actinomyctemcomitans pathogenic and H. aphrophilus merely commensal.
Help received
Dr. Casey Chen for letting me use the lab in USC and helping me in the project, Dr. Wei-zhen Chen and Dr. Ying Wang for helping me do the project. Mom, Dad, Mabel, and Weikuo for support,
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2016
A Prevotella intermedia Genomic Library to Identify Hemolysin Genes
CSEF · 2015
Determining Genetic Causes of Streptococcus pyogenes' Susceptibility to Retinoic Acid
CSEF · 2017
Strains of Photorhabdus Isolated in the Santa Monica Mountains Are Most Similar to Each Other and Strains from Wisconsin
ISEF · 2017
That Gut Feeling: Identifying the Gut Microbiota in Different Groups of Children
ISEF · 2014
Genetic and Immunological Responses to Infection with Periodontal Pathogens in the Development of Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease in ApoE -/- Mice
CSEF · 2015
Adaptations to Restriction Enzymes in Various Bacteriophage Genomes
CSEF · 2004
Isolation, Identification, and Characterization of Four Antibiotic-Resistant Soil Bacteria
CSEF · 2004
Assessment of Enteric Oral Flora of Dogs
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects