Fuels of the Future: A Comparison between the Molecular Mass of a Fuel and the Amount of Energy It Produces
CSEF · 2011 Materials Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals In our experiment, we tested the relationship between the molecular mass of a fuel and the amount of energy it produces. The whole idea of this experiment was to see if current fuels we are using are our best energy source option. In other words, why we use the fuels we use. We decided to include molecular mass because we were interested to see if there was a chemical reason why some fuels produced more energy than others. We believe that if the molecular mass of a fuel is small, then it will produce more energy because the smaller groups will oxidize more easily. Methods/Materials Tested 8 fuels; biodiesel, ethanol, soybean oil, peanut oil, diesel, motor oil, gasoline, & canola oil. First, we figured out each fuel#s molecular mass. Then, we placed 2.4 mL of the fuel on a regular size cotton ball. From there, we burned the fuel and the cotton ball under a can of 100 mL of water and recorded the change in temperature every 10 seconds. The amount of time each fuel burned was also recorded in our data. In our testing, the independent variable was the molecular mass of the fuel and the dependent was the amount of energy that was produced. Equipment: Metal Cup, Cotton balls, Metric Ruler, Soda Can, Liquid Measuring Cup, Immersion Alcohol Thermometer, Dropper, Tape, Water, Lighter, Paper Towels, Metal Clamp, Baking Soda, Ring stand with 3 inch ring. Results Our hypothesis, if the molecular mass of the fuel is small, then more energy will be produced because the smaller groups will oxidize more easily, was proven inconclusive. As we looked over our fourth graph, we discovered that there is virtually no relationship between the molecular mass of the fuel and the amount of energy the fuel produces. We are lead to believe that there is a possibility of a relationship between the molecular mass of a fuel and the time it takes to burn. Conclusions/Discussion Our hypothesis was not supported by the data we collected. We did determine that different fuel types produced different amounts of energy. However, with the data we collected, we did not find any relationship between the molecular mass and the amount of energy a fuel produced. If we were to repeat our experiment, we would do all of the trials on the same day. Also, we would test to see if there is a relationship between a fuel's molecular mass and its burn time and we would further examine the burn characteristics to see which fuels are better for the environment.
Summary statement
Our project tested to see if there is a fuel characteristic (their molecular mass) that explains why some fuels produce more energy than others.
Help received
We borrowed some equipment from La Reina High School for our experiment (i.e. ring stand, dropper, immersion alcohol thermometer). My Dad helped us build the apparatus and he oversaw the first two trials to make sure we were burning the materials safely.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2013
Fuel and Fire: Analyzing Tomorrow's Power
CSEF · 2005
Fuel for the Future?
CSEF · 2009
Fuel Go Boom
CSEF · 2013
From Fields to Fuels: A Comparison of Energy Content of Biodiesels Made from Waste Vegetable Oils
CSEF · 2015
Bang for Your Buck: The Effect of the Type of Fuel on Energy Content
CSEF · 2005
Fuels and Their Efficiency to Produce Energy
CSEF · 2017
Comparing the Heat Energy of Bio-Fuel to Conventional Fossil Fuels
CSEF · 2016
Burning Biofuels
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects