Finding Calm: Meditation vs. Mobile Games

CSEF · 2018 Mammalian Biology

Overview

Objectives/Goals The objective of this study is to determine whether meditation or mobile games are more effective in activating calming brain waves. Methods/Materials 40 subjects, a Muse meditation application on an ipad, Two Dots game application on an iphone, and a portable electroencephalogram. Subjects were tested in two sessions with a washout period in between. Subjects were randomized to meditate or play the mobile game for 5 minutes, while the electroencephalogram measured the brain waves. After a washout period, the subjects performed the opposite task. MUSE brain sensing EEG headband (InterAxon Inc.), disposable alcohol wipes. Results The p-value of the two tailed t-test indicated that negligible carryover effects existed from one treatment to the next. Another two tailed t-test was performed to test for differences within subjects and identify which treatment resulted in more seconds of calm. The p-value revealed that differences in treatment effects were significant. The average duration of calm for meditation was 197 seconds out of 300 and 164 seconds out of 300 for mobile games. Conclusions/Discussion The results supported my hypothesis that meditation would be more calming than mobile games. Meditation is more effective in achieving a calmer state of mind than mobile games because it produces more gamma brain waves, which are beneficial in improving memory recall, sensory perception, and focus. Mobile games, however, still activated gamma brain waves, which indicate high levels of calm. Knowing that mobile games also produce a calming effect is useful because one can calm themselves in a noisy and crowded environment by playing a mobile game, when meditation may not be feasible or socially acceptable.

Summary statement

I showed that both meditation and mobile games produced calm brain waves, but meditation was more calming.

Help received

I designed and tested the experiment myself. I reviewed excel calculations under the supervision of T. Tong. I got help in understanding the statistical comparison of data from Dr. Jiaxiao X. Shi at Kaiser Permanente in Woodland Hills.

Competition history

  • CSEF 2018 Mammalian Biology · Entry J1321

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google