Fast Trash: Safely Speeding Up Rates of Decomposition in Models of a Landfill
CSEF · 2002 Environmental Engineering
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective of this project was to find which treatment group in landfill models had one of the fastest rates of decomposition, while releasing less amounts of gas. Methods/Materials Six treatment groups were kept at different temperatures and different liquids were added to them. Five of these test groups were: water, a 10% sugar solution, a 10% salt solution, heat(33°C)and cold (18°C). The sixth group was the control, it was kept at 25°C and no liquids were added to it. Six sets of models were made for each of the six groups. The models were made from plastic empty milk bottles (which are made from the same material as landfill liners) filled with layers of soil and objects that represented each type of trash. Every week, for six weeks, one model from each treatment group was opened and the mass of the different objects was recorded. The amount of gas emitted by the models was measured by using a system of water displacement. Results The group with heat had the fastest rate of decomposition and released the most amount of gas. The control group had the slowest rate of decomposition and gave off the least amount of gas. The group with the 10% sugar solution had the second fastest rate of decomposition, while emitting the third least amount of gas. Conclusions/Discussion In landfills, garbage usually takes decades to decompose and the gas released contributes to the greenhouse effect. Not all landfills are identical. For some landfills it might be a good idea to add different liquids or increase the temperature to optimize rates of decomposition and gas emissions. The results suggest that adding a 10% sugar solution would be beneficial for increasing rates of decomposition and minimizing gas emissions for the average landfill.
Summary statement
This project is about how different temperatures and liquids increase rates of decomposition while producing less gas in landfill models.
Help received
Dr. Robert Anex, Dr. Dennis Truax, and Mr. Ray Huitric answered questions. Parents proofread. Advisor supervised.
Competition history
- CSEF 2002
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2017
Investigating the Effects of Added Materials and Temperature on Plant Decomposition
CSEF · 2009
Trash Wars: Are Landfills Effective?
CSEF · 2010
Why Mummify if You Can Say Goodbye? Comparing Biodegradation in Dry-tomb and Bioreactor Landfills by Measuring CO(2)
CSEF · 2005
Design for Biodegradation: Harnessing Natural Decay by Managing Physical and Chemical Dynamics
CSEF · 2014
The Effects of Sorting Refuse on Methane Generation in Landfills
CSEF · 2009
An Analysis of the Release of Green House Gasses from Landfills
CSEF · 2007
Compact Contained Device for the Increased Efficiency of the Compost Mulching Process
ISEF · 2021
Thrown, but Will It Break Down? - A Study of the Correlation of the pH of Soil and Its Effect on the Rate at which Biodegradable Materials Decompose and the Application of the Findings of this Experiment in Landfills
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects