Fall Factor: Testing the Forces Resulting from Lead Climbing Falls
CSEF · 2013 Applied Mechanics & Structures
Overview
Objectives/Goals To find the forces resulting from lead climbing falls and to find an effective way to reduce these forces. Methods/Materials Materials: #50 meter long, 10.8 mm diameter climbing rope; #Two 25 lb weights; #Weston 320 lb scale with slider to record maximum weight; #Two slings (for anchor and to attach scale to tree); #Two carabiners for anchor point; #Kong Impact Shock Absorber (KISA); #Tape measure. For Standard Test: 1. Assemble anchor point using sling and carabiner attached to railing. 2. Pass rope through anchor point and tie rope to weight(s). 3. Set distance of fall by measuring length of rope between weight and anchor point. 4. Tie other end of rope to scale attached to tree. 5. Drop weight from anchor point. 6. Record force of fall. 7. Repeat steps 2-5 three times for each distance. For Friction Device Test: Repeat steps in standard test while using the friction shock absorber device. For Belayer Test: Repeat steps for standard and friction device tests, tying rope and scale to a human belayer rather than a tree. Results For the 25 lb weight, the forces recorded ranged from 49 lbs at 5 ft up to 111 lbs for a 12-ft fall. For the 50 lb weight for a 5 ft fall, 185 lbs was the minimum. The maximum for an 11 foot fall was 285 lbs. For both weights, at 9 ft the forces started to increase less with distance. We believe this happened because a damping material in the rope started to activate at this distance or force. The friction device tests showed that the device reduced the impact forces, especially on longer falls; for an 11 ft fall the force was reduced by ~40 %. In the belayer tests, we found that a human belayer acts as a shock absorber and dampens the impact forces. Some of the forces with a real belayer and friction shock absorber were less than 50% of those without a friction device and no belayer. Conclusions/Discussion From our tests, we observe that long lead-climbing falls generate forces that can injure people. We also found that forces generated by these falls were not linear, and varied with fall height, most likely due to the stretch of the rope. The inexpensive, easy-to-use, reusable friction shock absorber greatly reduced the impact force during falls. This device could potentially save lives and prevent injuries if climbers used it. We also found that a human belayer acts as a shock absorber. The friction device and belayer together
Summary statement
To find the forces resulting from lead climbing falls and to find an effective way to reduce these forces.
Help received
Julie Foquet helped check our board, Kirt Williams let us use his 60M dinamic rope and two 25 lb weights. Mother edited writeup.
Competition history
- CSEF 2013
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2003
Perilous Playgrounds: The Physics of Distinguishing Which Playground Surface Material Reduces Force on a Head on Impact
CSEF · 2005
How Strong Is That Knot? A Study of the Knot Efficiency of the Double Fisherman's Knot
CSEF · 2017
The Effect of Concussion Bands Tested at Various Heights
CSEF · 2005
Heads Up: A Study on Soccer Head Protection
CSEF · 2013
Concussion Cushion
CSEF · 2006
Get Your Head in the Game
CSEF · 2014
The Effect of Different Impact Absorbing Materials on a Simulated Human Head Model
ISEF · 2020
Engineering a Superior Bumper Reinforcement System with a Piezoelectric Force Sensor in High Energy Collisions
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects