Determining Optimal Pitch Selection Using Run Values and PITCHf/x Data
Overview
Objective: To create a mathematical model which, when applied to a Major League Baseball hitter’s pitch-by-pitch data and a pitcher’s pitch selection, returns the optimal pitch selection given the number of balls and strikes. Procedure: Data from Retrosheet.org are used to calculate average run values of at-bat outcomes. Individual pitch outcomes are used to calculate corresponding Bayesian changes in the probabilities of each at-bat outcome. These two numbers are multiplied to return the expected change in run value caused by any given pitch outcome in any given count. This new metric, Expected Run Value Added (ERVA), is determined for each combination of pitch outcome and count. PITCHf/x data are used to create a standardized similarity formula, which is then used to quantify the “similarity” between any two pitches. ERVA values and similarity weights are appended to the hitter’s 2016 PITCHf/x data, and the target pitch is continually adjusted in order to calculate multiple weighted averages of the hitter’s ERVA against each pitch type and location in the pitcher’s repertoire. These pitch-by-pitch averages reveal the opposing hitter’s demonstrated strengths and weaknesses. Conclusion: The ERVA table by count and pitch outcome is extremely viable. In 180 out of 180 values generated, the sign (positive or negative) matches the play’s direction, and the magnitude matches intuitive expectations. The similarity weights, as expected, closely follow a lognormal distribution. Finally, the pitch selection results show some correlation with simpler measures of hitter’s strengths and weaknesses, and interpolation within the training data yields convincing results. However, until the model is exposed to new test data in future MLB games, its precise predictive ability is unclear.
Competition history
- ISEF 2017
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2015
Watch the Curve: Using Statistical Modeling to Predict the Next Baseball Pitch
ISEF · 2014
The Secret Formula
CSEF · 2016
The Science Behind Moneyball
ISEF · 2022
Can High School Baseball Players Optimize Their College Recruiting by Analyzing Their Athletic Metrics?
CSEF · 2008
The Ket to a Winning Streak
CSEF · 2006
What Makes a Team Win More or Fewer than Pythagorean Expectation?
CSEF · 2012
Scouting vs. Sabremetrics
CSEF · 2008
What Really Makes a Hitter's Ballpark? An Analysis of the Effect of Field Area on Baseball Offensive Statistics
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: Regeneron International Science and Engineering Fair