Compressive Strength in Concrete vs. Environmental Sustainability
CSEF · 2018 Applied Mechanics & Structures First Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals My project was designed to figure out if there is potentially a more environmentally sustainable coarse aggregate alternative that will have a similar compressive strength to traditional coarse aggregate in concrete. Methods/Materials For my experiment I used 3 different coarse aggregates in my concrete samples: traditional # inch large aggregate (control), recycled aggregate from a previous construction and recycled rubber mulch. I made 3 samples of each aggregate type. My hypothesis was that the control would be the strongest, but that the recycled aggregate would be very close in strength, and the rubber would be the weakest. After mixing, my samples cured in a moisture controlled environment. My tests were performed at Twining Lab in Long Beach, CA, using industry standards for testing compressive strength in concrete. Results At 7 days, the traditional coarse aggregate had a compressive strength of 2970 psi, the recycled aggregate was at 2720 psi, and the rubber aggregate was at 480 psi. After 28 days of curing, I tested the remaining 2 samples from each aggregate type. The traditional coarse aggregate samples had an average compressive strength of 4460 psi, the recycled aggregate was at 3925 psi, and the rubber aggregate was at 601 psi. Conclusions/Discussion Therefore my hypothesis that the traditional aggregate would be the strongest followed by the recycled aggregate, and that the rubber would be the weakest, was supported by my results. However, I also learned that although rubber aggregate does not give a high compressive strength to concrete, it has other potentially useful qualities.
Summary statement
I found that recycled aggregate has a similar compressive strength to traditional coarse aggregate, and could be a viable replacement in most construction jobs, while rubber cannot be a replacement for high strength requirements.
Help received
I mixed my samples with the help of my Aunt Sunny. Corey Rhodes, the laboratory manager at Twining Laboratory, sulfur capped the concrete samples and preformed the compression tests.
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2018
Resources
Related projects
ISEF · 2026
The Effect of Aggregate Size and Type on the Structural Integrity of Concrete
CSEF · 2012
Aggregate Size vs. Concrete Strength
CSEF · 2007
Green Concrete
CSEF · 2016
Is Earth-Friendly Concrete Stronger than Traditional Portland Concrete?
CSEF · 2010
Concrete: A Use for Used Tires
CSEF · 2018
Comparing the Compression Strength of Reclaimed Wood Structures to New Wood Structures
CSEF · 2016
Can Papercrete Compete with Concrete?
ISEF · 2015
Concrete Solutions
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects