Comparing the Drag Coefficient of Four Popular Sports Cars
CSEF · 2007 Applied Mechanics & Structures
Overview
Objectives/Goals This experiment was to show the relationship between sports car design and aerodynamic drag coefficient. Methods/Materials Four 1/24th scale plastic sports car models were used: Ford GT, Chevrolet Corvette, Ferrari Spider and a Dodge Viper. To eliminate the variable of rolling fiction a free rolling platform was created on which the cars were attached. All the cars were balanced to the common weight,open windows taped closed. Testing was completed in a wind tunnel originally created to test the importance of angle of attack to the flight of an airplane. The tunnels wind speed was 24 mph or 10.73 m/s produced by a single speed motor. A wire lever and electronic balance was used to measure drag force. I tested each car five times disregarding the highest and lowest measurements and then calculated their averages, adjusting each measurement due to the length of the measurement lever. Results The aerodynamic drag and drag coefficient were as follows: Ford GT 21.63 gm or .36, Chevrolet Corvette 22.50gm or .36, Ferrari Spider 21.92 gm or .36, and the Dodge Viper 20.80gm or .33. Conclusions/Discussion Drag coefficient is a number that is used to compare one cars design to another. It is equal to two times the aerodynamic drag divided by the density of air times the cars frontal area times the square of the velocity of the air. I was surprised to discover that the Viper created the lowest aerodynamic drag of all the cars I tested. I believe the Vipers low roof height as well as smooth body transition from front to back created a more streamline flow over the car. Low drag means better gas mileage, but for sports cars, low aerodynamic drag and high horsepower means a greater top speed. Sixty percent of the horsepower needed to drive at freeway speed is used to overcome aerodynamic drag. Though the wedge shaped design of sports cars makes them appealling, their wedge shape is neccessary to create a down force to keep the wheels on the ground. The wedge shape does not necessarily result in better aerodynamics. As a comparison, the drag coefficient of a Volkswagen Beatle .38 is two tenth better than the famous Lamborghini Countach at .42. This is possible because one of the key variables in the drag coefficient calculation in a cars frontal area (forward area exposed to the oncoming air).
Summary statement
This experiment showed the relationship between sports car design and aerodynamic drag coefficient.
Help received
My father helped redesign the windtunnel, mother helped with display board, Dr. Jim Selgrath approved project, Mr. Dan Halbur helped explain conversions and calculations.
Competition history
- CSEF 2007
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2006
Measuring the Effect of Aerodynamic Design on Vehicular Drag
CSEF · 2010
What A Drag!
CSEF · 2007
Automotive Drag: Which Type of Car Design Has the Least Amount of Drag?
CSEF · 2008
The Effect of Shape on Aerodynamic Drag
CSEF · 2004
Drag Reduction of a Mini Cooper
CSEF · 2007
The Fast, the Furious, and the Aerodynamic
CSEF · 2016
Need for Speed: A Study of Drag Reduction Methods in Vehicles
CSEF · 2012
Air Resistance: What a Drag! Does the Shape of a Car Affect the Amount of Air Resistance?
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects