Brainwave Derived Electronic Control

CSEF · 2003 Electricity & Electronics

Overview

Objectives/Goals The main goal of this project is to demonstrate the feasibility of building a low-cost Brain Computer Interface (BCI) for electronic control of devices using Electroencephalographic (EEG) techniques. I hypothesize that it is possible to achieve enough control for people with neuromuscular disorders to gain independence, and for normal people to gain improved efficiencies in their daily lives. Methods/Materials I pasted passive electrodes on my scalp using 10-20 Conductive Paste in bipolar configuration to sense the Mu-Rhythm of a single channel EEG. Imagining pressing a button was used for forward control and computing an intensive math problem was used for backward control in several epochs. I amplified these signals using AD620 instrumentation amplifier and OP90 Operational Amplifier, and digitized them using a 12-bit ADS7806P Analog-to-Digital converter. I used mathematical techniques like linear regression, Hamming Window, and computed FFT to acquire 7.5-12 Hz frequency components. Then I trained a 3-layer Artificial Neural Network and used test samples to recognize forward and backward commands. Finally, I modified the remote control of a R/C car, and applied the forward and backward electronic commands to move the car. In subsequent sessions, I used the trained Neural Net of previous session to retrain for improving recognition rates. Results At the end of my first session, I obtained 40% successful recognition rate. Using this trained Neural Net, I achieved 72% success rate on my second session, and 74% success rate on my third session. It's noteworthy to observe the dramatic improvement on the second, and third sessions compared to the first. Conclusions/Discussion The results prove that it is possible to achieve the BCI control to a useful degree. By carefully controlling the quality of materials, processes, and processing, I believe more than 95% success rate is possible. Compared to the subjects used in the research community above 21 years of age, I am only 16. My first trial success rate of 40% was way above the 20-30% reported in the research community probably because of better intuition. Also, I haven't used any active feedback. I think this technology is critically important even for ordinary people to improve their working efficiency just like a cell phone!

Summary statement

Brain to Computer Interface for controlling electronic devices is a very important technology for handicapped and ordinary people.

Help received

Faith Medical Inc, and Texas Instruments donated materials and components. Dr. Metherate helped discuss many concepts. My father supervised for safety, and mother helped with transportation. My mentors Dr. Shugarman, and Dr. Allali encouraged throughout.

Awards (1)

  • Category Award

Competition history

  • CSEF 2003 Electricity & Electronics · Entry S0713

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google