Adaptive Calibration Scheduling for Quantum Processors via Conservative Bandits
CSEF · 2026 Computational Science (Senior Division)
Overview
Calibration is essential for the operation of quantum processors. However, each calibration process requires time and effort. Thus, the goal of this research is to rethink the calibration process as a real-time decision problem under cost constraints. Instead of fixed schedules, each decision takes both the current and the future risks into consideration. In order to make sure the algorithm does not act aggressively, I also designed a conservative policy that only allows the algorithm to act when the statistics show that the performance degrades below the baseline. The data for drifting used in this research is from AWS Braket, which is a physical superconducting quantum processor. According to the observations, there are a few distinct behaviors across channels: an increase of mean readout (1 to 0, 0 to 1) error, a burst increase in coherent gate anomaly, and shifts in two-qubit odd-parity measurements. The calibration strategy based on these drift parameters is compared with the corresponding budget adjustments using Monte Carlo simulations. Benchmark results show that within the low-budget range (e.g., mean cumulative payoff of 64.28 at budget B=10.0, 95% confidence interval [63.15, 65.41], the conservative bandit dominantly outperforms the periodic baseline. To quantify when the adaptive table maximizes value, I plot the boundary line B^(c) between the conservative table and periodic partial recalibration as a function of the recalibration cost multiplier c (here, we can interpret c as effective opportunity cost (e.g., peak-demand or reserved-time operation)). In the cost-sensitive region, the strict advantage region dramatically expands (e.g., B^_strict increases from 11 at c=1 to 53 at c=5 ). This shows the conservative policy's advantage as the opportunity cost increases. However, there is also a limitation when applying the heterogeneity stress test, in which the algorithm performs worse than the full and partial calibration. Overall, these results show that it is beneficial to treat calibration operations as making real-time sequential decisions, as it reduces cost and increases reliability.
Competition history
- CSEF 2026
Related projects
ISEF · 2025
Breaking Barriers in Quantum Circuit Optimization With Efficient and Noise-Resilient Real-Time Adaptation
ISEF · 2026
Quantum Canary: Neural Network Based Autonomous Noise Drift Detection in NISQ Era Quantum Processors
CWSF · 2026
HybridCSP
CSEF · 2026
Universal Quantum Error Mitigation via Random Inverse Depolarizing Approximation
ISEF · 2026
Advancing Scalable Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Multi-Qubit Systems With Colored Noise
ISEF · 2026
Carnot-Guided Warm-Optimization of Dilution Refrigerators: A Reduction in the Electrical and Cost and Material Cost Drivers in Quantum Computing
ISEF · 2019
Heisenberg-Scaling Measurement Protocol for Analytic Functions with Quantum Sensor Networks
ISEF · 2018
Utilizing Machine Learning to Generate Efficient Quantum Algorithms
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects