A Test on Chess: Chess Perception
CSEF · 2011 Cognitive Science (Junior Division Only)
Overview
Objectives/Goals The objective is to determine if a glass chess set or a wood chess set will allow your brain to detect more possible moves in different scenarios. Our hypothesis is that a wood chess set allows your brain to detect more possible moves because there is a greater contrast of the colors than on the glass chess set. Methods/Materials One glass chess set ("Set 1"), one wood set ("Set 2"), and two recording books. 12 games were played, 6 on Set 1, 6 on Set 2, with players alternating colors. Moves thought and moves played were tallied by each player and then were converted into unit ratios. These numbers were averaged for each player in each arrangement (e.g., player 1, set 1, "white"), then averaged over both players to show a unit ratio of moves thought to moves played at each possible playing station. Results Players saw more possible moves thought per move played on the Set 1 (glass) than Set 2 (wood). Playing Set 1 (glass) white had a unit ratio of 2.16 and black was 2.29. Playing Set 2 (wood), white had a unit ratio of 1.51 and black was 1.44. For Set 1 (glass), player 1 and player 2 showed big differences. Player 1 was 2.72 for white and 2.7 for black. Player 2 was 1.59 for white and 1.8 for black. For Set 2, their differences between players weren't large. Player 1 was 1.59 for white and 1.49 for black. Player 2 was 1.45 for white and 1.39 for black. Conclusions/Discussion Our hypothesis was wrong. We thought it would be easier to detect more moves on Set 2 (wood), but we detected more moves on Set 1 (glass). The biggest problem is that this experiment only applies to player 1 and 2. We could have used more people to get more data with a wider variety of chess players. Our results might be useful for chess players. For example, maybe inexperienced players shouldn't choose glass because they might get overwhelmed with the number of moves thought, so there is a larger possibility that they will choose the wrong move. Experienced players might benefit from seeing more possible moves.
Summary statement
We used a glass and a wood chess set to study whether the brain detects more possible moves on a set with higher color contrast.
Help received
Mrs. Macy helped us schedule our work; our parents drove us to each others' houses to play chess, took pictures and helped us condense our abstract for this application.
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2015
CheckMate: The Effect of Playing Chess on Spatial Cognition
CSEF · 2004
Spatial Reasoning Abilities: Chess Players vs. Non-Chess Players
CSEF · 2013
Chessers, a Mind-Boggling Game: How Chunking, Interference, Entanglement and Negative Transfer Make a Mess of Things
CSEF · 2011
Point, Set, Match: Can Visual Perceptual Therapy Help Master the Art of Observation?
CSEF · 2008
Who's a Better Learner, Children or Adults?
CSEF · 2016
Processing Patterns: Does Age Make a Difference?
CSEF · 2023
Does Chess Affect Test Scores?
CSEF · 2006
The Least Obvious Choice: Modified Rock-Paper-Scissors as a Testing Ground for the Human Mind
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects