A Long Shot: Optimizing a Projectile Launching Apparatus
CSEF · 2011 Applied Mechanics & Structures First Award
Overview
Objectives/Goals This past summer, my dad and I invented a toy, a SLOTTER, for playing table-top coin games. The purpose of my project was to discover the optimal combination of variables that maximizes the throwing capability of a SLOTTER, allowing it to throw a projectile the greatest distance. Methods/Materials The variables I tested were: projectile mass, card material and size, pull-back angle, and SLOTTER angle. I tested a combination of three different projectiles (penny, nickel, quarter), four types of card material (polyethylene, PVC, PVC laminated, PVC varnished), four card widths (full, 1/2, 1/3, 1/4), four pull-back angles (31, 38, 45, 52 degrees) and six different SLOTTER angles (25, 35, 45, 55, 65, 75 degrees). I sequentially tested, optimized, and controlled each variable in a systematic order. High speed video was used to confirm that the final set of variables were the optimal combination. Results The results of my project were consistent with my background research on projectile trajectories, spring dynamics, and basic laws of motion. However, there was still a surprising finding. The optimal combination of variables were: the lightest projectile (penny), the card with the highest modulus of elasticity (polyethylene), the widest card (full width), the largest pull-back angle (52 degrees), and surprisingly, a SLOTTER angle of 75 degrees. Conclusions/Discussion From these results I can conclude that the following combination of variables will cause a projectile to travel the maximum distance: a)A projectile with the least mass b)A spring made of a material with the highest modulus of elasticity, while still being able to deform the maximum amount without surpassing its elastic limit c)The largest spring possible for the launching apparatus d)The largest amount of spring deformation possible for the launching apparatus e)A launching apparatus angle that combines with the amount of spring deformation to cause a projectile launch angle of 45 degrees (for this experiment a SLOTTER angle of 75 degrees was optimal, not 45 degrees like my hypothesis stated). Next, I hope to use my knowledge gained from this and previous science fair projects to improve on spring powered toy cars and airplane launchers.
Summary statement
The goal of this project was to optimize a spring-based toy that my dad and I invented last summer.
Help received
My dad acted as a co-inventor, mentor, and assisted me during the testing process.
Awards (1)
Competition history
- CSEF 2011
Resources
Related projects
CSEF · 2004
Launching into Physics: A Study of Projectile Motion
CSEF · 2008
Ready, Aim, Fire! Maximizing the Trebuchet's Range
CSEF · 2004
Trebuchet
CSEF · 2005
The Trebuchet: A Study of Mechanics and Motion
CSEF · 2004
Investigations into the Art of Hurling: Effects of Trebuchet Arm Length and Counterweight Mass on Projectile Distance
CSEF · 2006
The Evaluation of Penetration Abilities of Various Slingshot Projectiles
CSEF · 2004
Trajectory of a Free Falling Object
CSEF · 2007
Shooting for Distance
Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.
Browse more like this
Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects