A Comparison of Two Sites in the Rio Guacimal Using Visual Assessment and Aquatic Macro-invertebrates

CSEF · 2006 Earth Sciences/ Planetary Sciences/ Physical Environments

Overview

Objectives/Goals The objective was to determine whether or not human activity was impacting Monteverde#s environment significantly. Methods/Materials Using visual assessment and macroinvertebrate study to compare the biodiversity and general health of two sites on the river, Site A in the midst of human activity and Site B not, the effects of human activity on the water quality of the Rio Guacimal were determined. In the NRCS Stream Visual Assessment Protocol, twelve parameters were analyzed on a scale of 1-10 (10= most optimal): Channel Conditions, Hydrological Alterations, Riparian Zone, Bank Stability, Water Appearance, Nutrient Enrichment, Barriers to Fish Movement, In stream Fish Cover, Pools, Invertebrate Habitat, Canopy Cover, and Manure Presence. In terms of the biological indicator study, 12 samples were taken within a 30 meter stretch at the two sites. Samples at each point were taken by kicking up the sediment at the river bottom for 30 seconds. Then, using the D-net, the churned-up water was poured from the net to a large plastic bowl. The water samples were then transferred to appropriately labeled Ziplock bags and taken to the Monteverde Institute. There, books and microscopes were used to taxonomically classify the macroinvertebrates to the order and phylum level. Results Visual assessment indicates that though Site B is slightly worse in health, the difference is small. Macroinvertebrate studies indicate that the sites are also similar in species richness; however, the species compositions do differ. The order Diptera had a significantly higher concentration and their predators (such as Plecoptera) were in lower concentration at site B. Because organisms of the order Diptera are more capable of surviving in polluted areas and deprived oxygen settings, there is biological evidence of reduced dissolved oxygen levels at Site B, an indication of pollution. The data gathered in this experiment indicates a negative correlation between human activity and the overall health of natural water sources. Conclusions/Discussion It was determined that mankind#s activities eliminate certain tropic levels, causing imbalance in aquatic ecosystems. This is important because reduction of species richness eliminates organisms that potentially could be used in biological research. In order to preserve the environment and diversity of Costa Rica humans should research how to minimize the impact their actions make on the environment.

Summary statement

Comparing two sites at the Rio Guacimal indicates that human activity does affect aquatic health.

Help received

Monteverde Institute helped us.

Awards (1)

  • Category Award

Competition history

  • CSEF 2006 Earth Sciences/ Planetary Sciences/ Physical Environments · Entry S0604

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google