A Comparison of Two Potential Lead Bioremediating Plants

CSEF · 2007 Environmental Engineering First Award

Overview

Objectives/Goals The problem I tested in my experiment was whether morning glory or Indian Mustard Greens were the most effective bioremediator of lead. Methods/Materials To test this problem, I planted both morning glory and Indian Mustard Greens seeds in two test beds of soils containing lead at concentrations of 990ppm and 330ppm. Each week I took measurements of height and counted the number of sprouts in each section. After 3 weeks, there was finally enough plant mass to do an XRF test, and from weeks four to six I harvested a portion of the plants and conducted weekly XRF tests to check the lead content. At the end of week six, all of the plants were uprooted, the roots were cut off, all of the excess dirt washed off, and they were dried and tested. Results The results showed that, of plants raised in the soil with 990ppm of lead, Indian Mustard Greens (with 7.28ppm) had almost double the amount of lead as in the morning glory (4.23ppm). In the soil with 330ppm morning glory had 4.93ppm of lead to the Indian Mustard Greens 3.19ppm of lead. Conclusions/Discussion Overall I concluded Indian Mustard Greens were the more effective bioremediator of lead. It is notable that while the Indian Mustard Greens showed more ill effects of the lead (including distressed leaves), they grew more robustly and generated more plant mass than the morning glory.

Summary statement

My project is a comparison of Indian Mustard Greens and Morning Glory to see which one is most effective at bioremediation.

Help received

My father (Thomas Zdeb) operated the XRF, analyzed the samples (he is a certified XRF analyst) and helped to ensure that all safety regulations were properly followed in this experiment; PCR Mobile Laboratories allowed me to use the XRF

Awards (1)

Competition history

  • CSEF 2007 Environmental Engineering · Entry J0924

Resources

Related projects

Closest projects by meaning, across every fair and year in the corpus.

Browse more like this

Source: California Science & Engineering Fair public projects

Save projects to your library

Sign in with Google to keep track of projects you find interesting, organized into folders. An account also raises your daily allowance for “Has this been done?”, and lets you create a key for the MCP server with a much higher limit than anonymous use. Browsing stays public.

Continue with Google